Parameter Study and Optimization of an Amperometric Biosensor for Pyruvate Determination Using Mathematical Modeling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2025.9.4.347608

Keywords:

pyruvate, amperometric biosensor, pyruvate oxidase, reaction-diffusion model, optimization

Abstract

Background. Pyruvate serves as an important diagnostic marker of mitochondrial dysfunctions, lactic acidosis, and certain oncological diseases. Traditional methods for pyruvate analysis have a number of significant limitations: they require complex equipment, are labor-intensive, involve time-consuming sample preparation. Therefore, the development of new, sensitive, and selective methods for determining pyruvate concentration is a highly relevant task.

Objective. The aim of this work was to develop a procedure for the determination and optimization of the parameters of a mathematical model of an amperometric biosensor based on immobilized pyruvate oxidase, employing mathematical modeling of diffusion–reaction processes.

Methods. The biosensor was fabricated using a photopolymer matrix. The analytical characteristics of the biosensor were investigated experimentally. Reaction–diffusion mathematical model was developed to analyze the sensitivity of the biosensor to the substrate (pyruvate) with respect to system parameters. Optimization of these parameters was performed using the gradient descent method.

Results. The study demonstrated that the pyruvate oxidase-based biosensor exhibited a stable amperometric response to pyruvate. Model analysis revealed a significant influence of the substrate diffusion coefficient and the thickness of the bioselective membrane on the biosensor’s sensitivity to pyruvate. The responses of the biosensors showed high signal reproducibility. The theoretically calculated response curves of the biosensor were in good agreement with the experimental data.

Conclusions. The biosensor is characterized by high sensitivity and reproducibility in pyruvate determination. Mathematical modeling enabled rational optimization of the biosensor parameters. The influence of all parameters on the biosensor sensitivity decreased in the following order: from the most influential enzymatic reaction rate constant (k), to the substrate diffusion coefficient (DS), to the membrane thickness (L), whereas the effect of the product diffusion coefficient (DP) was found to be minimal.

References

Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L., & Stryer, L. (2015). Biochemistry. 8th ed. W.H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 1464126100, 9781464126109

Sutendra G, Michelakis ED. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase as a novel therapeutic target in oncology. Frontiers in oncology. 2013 Mar 7; 3:38. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00038

Lu W, Clasquin MF, Melamud E, Amador-Noguez D, Caudy AA, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolomic Analysis via Reversed-Phase Ion-Pairing Liquid Chromatography Coupled to a Stand Alone Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry. 2010 Apr 15;82(8):3212–21. DOI: 10.1021/ac902837x

Dzyadevych SV, Arkhypova VN, Soldatkin AP, El’skaya AV, Martelet C, Jaffrezic-Renault N. Amperometric enzyme biosensors: Past, present and future. IRBM [Internet]. 2008 Apr 1 [cited 2020 Apr 11];29(2):171–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmret.2007.11.007

Mizutani F, Soichi Yabuki, Sato Y, Takahiro Sawaguchi, Iijima S. Amperometric determination of pyruvate, phosphate and urea using enzyme electrodes based on pyruvate oxidase-containing poly(vinyl alcohol)/polyion complex-bilayer membrane. Electrochimica acta. 2000 Jun 1;45(18):2945–52. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00373-X

Korkut S, Keskinler B, Erhan E. An amperometric biosensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotube-poly(pyrrole)-horseradish peroxidase nanobiocomposite film for determination of phenol derivatives. Talanta. 2008 Sep 15;76(5):1147–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.016

Piro B, Reisberg S. Recent Advances in Electrochemical Immunosensors. Sensors. 2017 Apr 7;17(4):794. DOI: 10.3390/s17040794

Yakovleva ME, Killyéni A, Ortiz R, Schulz C, MacAodha D, Conghaile PÓ, et al. Recombinant pyranose dehydrogenase—A versatile enzyme possessing both mediated and direct electron transfer. Electrochemistry Communications. 2012 Sep 8;24:120–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.08.029

Baronas R, Ivanauskas F, Kulys J. Mathematical Modeling of Biosensors. Springer Series on Chemical Sensors and Biosensors. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. Springer eBook ISBN978-90-481-3243-0 DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3243-0

Baronas R, Kulys J. Modelling Amperometric Biosensors Based on Chemically Modified Electrodes. Sensors. 2008 Aug 19; 8(8):4800–20. DOI: 10.3390/s8084800

Sierra-Padilla A, García-Guzmán JJ, Blanco-Díaz L, Bellido-Milla D, José María Palacios-Santander, Cubillana-Aguilera L. Innovative Multipolymer-Based Electrochemical Biosensor Built on a Sonogel–Carbon Electrode Aiming for Continuous and Real-Time Lactate Determination in Physiological Samples: A New Scenario to Exploit Additive Printing. Engineering Proceedings. 2023 Sep 26;48(1):48. DOI: 10.3390/CSAC2023-14902

Kucherenko IS, Soldatkin OO, Topolnikova YV, Dzyadevych SV, Soldatkin AP. Novel Multiplexed Biosensor System for the Determination of Lactate and Pyruvate in Blood Serum. Electroanalysis. 2019 May 22;31(8):1608–14. DOI: 10.1002/elan.201900229

Romero MR, Baruzzi AM, Garay F. Mathematical modeling and experimental results of a sandwich-type amperometric biosensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2012 Feb;162(1):284–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.12.079

Jose R, Madalina Maria Barsan, Sanz CG, Diculescu VC. Electrochemical bienzymatic biosensor for pyruvate kinase activity evaluation and inhibitor screening. Talanta. 2025 Mar 1; 291(6):127886. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2025.127886

Malik M, Chaudhary R, Pundir CS. An improved enzyme nanoparticles based amperometric pyruvate biosensor for detection of pyruvate in serum. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2019 Jan 11;123:30–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.01.006

Md. Aminur Rahman, Park DS, Chang SC, McNeil CJ, Shim YB. The biosensor based on the pyruvate oxidase modified conducting polymer for phosphate ions determinations. Biosensors & bioelectronics/Biosensors & bioelectronics (Online). 2006 Jan 1;21(7):1116–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.04.008

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

1.
Karpenko Y, Soldatkin O, Jaffrezic-Renault N. Parameter Study and Optimization of an Amperometric Biosensor for Pyruvate Determination Using Mathematical Modeling. Innov Biosyst Bioeng [Internet]. 2025Dec.23 [cited 2025Dec.25];9(4):46-5. Available from: https://ibb.kpi.ua/article/view/347608