Morphometric Changes in Rat Periwound Skin During Healing of Excisional Wounds After Exposure to Chronic Social Stress

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2025.9.1.310092

Keywords:

wound healing, chronic social stress, periwound, epidermis, dermis, subcutaneous tissue

Abstract

Background. Chronic stress is the most common systemic factor that negatively affects the body's overall resistance, including wound healing. While many aspects of skin recovery after a surgical wound are well defined, the involvement of cells in the periwound rarea emains unsufficiently studied.

Objective. To determine the morphological features of the periwound skin at different stages of the healing process after exposure to chronic social stress.

Methods. Chronic social stress was modeled through long-term psychoemotional exposure in Wistar laboratory rats of the experimental group. Animals in both control and experimental groups were wounded in the interscapular area by skin excision. The material of the periwounds was collected on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th and 30th days of wound healing and processed according to standard histological methods.

Results. Exposure to chronic social stress led to thinning of the skin layers even before wounding. Visual wound healing was delayed. The main reparative processes by phases (inflammation, proliferation, and remodulation) also occurred with significant delays.

Conclusions. Aggressive-dominant social stress is a rather strong damaging factor for susceptible animals, leading to impaired physiological skin regeneration. This was evident in the thinning of skin layers observed in histological samples even before wound application, resulting from reduced proliferation and differentiation processes. The negative consequences of chronic social stress were further manifested in the healing of a surgical wound: the repair processes during the main phases, in particular inflammation and proliferation, were delayed, which ultimately led to the chronicity of reparative regeneration.

References

Mahdavian Delavary B, van der Veer WM, van Egmond M, Niessen FB, Beelen RHJ. Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology. 2011;216(7):753-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.01.001

Mostafavi Yazdi SJ, Baqersad J. Mechanical modeling and characterization of human skin: A review. J Biomech. 2022;130:110864. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110864

Mansfield K, Naik S. Unraveling immune-epithelial interactions in skin homeostasis and injury. Yale J Biol Med. 2020;93(1):133-43.

Jiao Q, Zhi L, You B, Wang G, Wu N, Jia Y. Skin homeostasis: Mechanism and influencing factors. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;27(1):123-34. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16155

Broughton G 2nd, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Wound healing: An overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):1e-S-32e-S. DOI: 10.1097/01

Peña OA, Martin P. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024;25:599-616. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-024-00715-1

Gonzalez AC, Costa TF, Andrade ZA, Medrado AR. Wound healing - A literature review. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(5):614-20. DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164741

Baum CL, Arpey CJ. Normal cutaneous wound healing: Clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(6):674-86; discussion 686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31612

Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):219-29. DOI: 10.1177/0022034509359125

Godbout JP, Glaser R. Stress-induced immune dysregulation: implications for wound healing, infectious disease and cancer. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2006;1(4):421-7.

Wynn M, Holloway S. The impact of psychological stress on wound healing: a theoretical and clinical perspective. Wounds UK. 2019;15(3):20-7.

Gouin JP. Chronic stress, immune dysregulation, and health. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011;5(6):476-85. DOI: 10.1177/1559827610395467

Grigorieva SM, Starosyla DB, Rybalko SL, Motronenko VV, Lutsenko TM, Galkin OY. Effect of recombinant human interleukin-7 on Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection. Ukr Biochem J. 2019;91(5):7-15. DOI: 10.15407/ubj91.05.007

American Psychological Association. Stress in America 2022: Concerned for the future, beset by inflation. 2022. Available from: https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2022/concerned-future-inflation.

American Psychological Association. Stress in America 2023: A nation recovering from collective trauma. 2023. Available from: https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2023/collective-trauma-recovery.

Theoharides TC. The impact of psychological stress on mast cells. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;125:388-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.07.007

Komi DEA, Khomtchouk K, Santa Maria PL. A review of the contribution of mast cells in wound healing: Involved molecular and cellular mechanisms. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020;3:298-312. DOI: 10.1007/s12016-019-08729-w

Virtanen MI, Brinchmann MF, Patel DM, Iversen MH. Chronic stress negatively impacts wound healing, welfare, and stress regulation in internally tagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Front Physiol. 2023;14:1147235. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1147235

Maassen S, Coenen B, Ioannidis M, Harber K, Grijpstra P, Van den Bossche J, et al. Itaconate promotes a wound-resolving phenotype in pro-inflammatory macrophages. Redox Biol. 2023;59:102591. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102591

Dorsett-Martin W. Rat models of skin wound healing: A review. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12(6):591-9.

Rippon MG, Rogers AA, Ousey K, Atkin L, Williams K. The importance of periwound skin in wound healing: An overview of the evidence. J Wound Care. 2022;31(8):648. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.8.648

Avci P, Sadasivam M, Gupta A, De Melo WC, Huang YY, Yin R, et al. Animal models of skin disease for drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2013;8(3):331-5. DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2013.761202

Ben-Ami Bartal I, Rodgers DA, Bernardez Sarria MS, Decety J, Mason P. Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. eLife. 2014;3:e01385. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01385

Rygula R, Abumaria N, Flügge G, Fuchs E, Rüther E, Havemann-Reinecke U. Anhedonia and motivational deficits in rats: Impact of chronic social stress. Behav Brain Res. 2005;162(1):127-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.009

Masis-Calvo M, Schmidtner AK, de Moura Oliveira VE, Grossmann CP, de Jong TR, Neumann ID. Animal models of social stress: The dark side of social interactions. Stress. 2018;21(5):417-32. DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2018.1462327

Nakano Y. Stress-induced modulation of skin immune function: Two types of antigen-presenting cells in the epidermis are differentially regulated by chronic stress. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151(1):50-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05980.x

Webster Marketon JI, Glaser R. Stress hormones and immune function. Cell Immunol. 2008;252(1-2):16-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.09.006

Vileikyte L. Stress and wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(1):49-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.005

Herman JP, Figueiredo HF, Mueller NK, Ulrich-Lai YM, Ostrander MM, Choi DC, et al. Central mechanisms of stress integration: Hierarchical circuitry controlling hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical responsiveness. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2003;24(3):151-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2003.07.001

Sandig H, McDonald J, Gilmour J, Arno M, Lee TH, Cousins DJ. Fibronectin is a TH1-specific molecule in human subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(3):528-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.04.036

Shastri M, Sharma M, Sharma K, Sharma A, Minz RW, Dogra S, Chhabra S. Cutaneous-immuno-neuro-endocrine (CINE) system: A complex enterprise transforming skin into a super organ. Experimental Dermatology 2024;33(3):1-19. DOI: 10.1111/exd.15029

Parker GA, Picut CA. Atlas of histology of the juvenile rat. Chennai: Elsevier Academic Press; 2016. 462 p.

Dhabhar FS. Acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses skin immunity. The role of stress hormones and leukocyte trafficking. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;917:876-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05454.x

Passeron T, Zouboulis CC, Tan J, Andersen ML, Katta R, Lyu X, et al. Adult skin acute stress responses to short-term environmental and internal aggression from exposome factors. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(10):1963-75. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17432

Raziyeva K, Kim Y, Zharkinbekov Z, Kassymbek K, Jimi S, Saparov A. Immunology of acute and chronic wound healing. Biomolecules. 2021;11(5):700.

Chapman CR, Tuckett RP, Song CW. Pain and stress in a systems perspective: Reciprocal neural, endocrine, and immune interactions. J Pain. 2008;9(2):122-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.006

Picard K, St-Pierre MK, Vecchiarelli HA, Bordeleau M, Tremblay ME. Neuroendocrine, neuroinflammatory, and pathological outcomes of chronic stress: A story of microglial remodeling. Neurochem Int. 2021;145:104987. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2021.104987

Sengupta P. The laboratory rat: Relating its age with human's. Int J Prev Med. 2013 Jun;4(6):624-30. DOI: 10.4103/2008-7802.117402

Andreollo NA, Santos EF, Araújo MR, Lopes LR. Rat's age versus human's age: What is the relationship? Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2012;25:49–51. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-67202012000100011

Pereira VH, Campos I, Sousa N. The role of autonomic nervous system in susceptibility and resilience to stress. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;14:102-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.01.003

Kyrou I, Tsigos C. Stress mechanisms and metabolic complications. Horm Metab Res. 2007;39(6):430-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-981462

Frolov OK, Makyeyeva LV, Aliyeva OG. Quantitative characteristics of mast cells in the course of wound healing in rats with chronic social stress. Acta Biologica Ukrainica. 2021;1(1):34-41.

Makyeyeva L, Frolov O, Aliyeva O. Functional changes in skin mast cells during surgical wound healing in rats after the influence of chronic social stress. Fitоterapiia Chasopys Phytotherapy Journal. 2024;2:36-46. DOI: 10.32782/2522-9680-2024-2-36

Forsythe P. Mast cells in neuroimmune interactions. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42(1):43-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.09.006

Oskeritzian CA. Mast cells and wound healing. Adv Wound Care. 2012;1(1):23-8. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2011.0357

Romana-Souza B, Chen L, DiPietro LA. Repeated stress-induced crosstalk between the sympathetic nervous system and mast cells contributes to delayed cutaneous wound healing in mice. J Neuroimmunol. 2023;379:578104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2023.578104

Shimba A, Ikuta K. Control of immunity by glucocorticoids in health and disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00281-020-00827-8

de Almeida TF, de Castro Pires T, Monte-Alto-Costa A. Blockade of glucocorticoid receptors improves cutaneous wound healing in stressed mice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016;241(4):353-8. DOI: 10.1177/1535370215612940

Bielefeld KA, Amini-Nik S, Alman BA. Cutaneous wound healing: Recruiting developmental pathways for regeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:2059-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1152-9

Jiang D, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Mesenchymal stem cells adaptively respond to environmental cues thereby improving granulation tissue formation and wound healing. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:697. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00697

Taves MD, Ashwell JD. Glucocorticoids in T cell development, differentiation, and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(4):233-43. DOI: 10.1038/s41577-020-00464-0

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

1.
Makyeyeva L, Frolov O, Aliyeva O. Morphometric Changes in Rat Periwound Skin During Healing of Excisional Wounds After Exposure to Chronic Social Stress. Innov Biosyst Bioeng [Internet]. 2025Feb.20 [cited 2025Feb.23];9(1):13-25. Available from: https://ibb.kpi.ua/article/view/310092