Intensification of the Biohydrogen Production Process

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2024.8.1.285588

Keywords:

biohydrogen, renewable energy carriers, agricultural wast, microbial fuel cell, microbial consortium

Abstract

Background. In the last decades, humanity has faced the challenge of finding new ways to obtain renewable, environmentally friendly energy carriers. Hydrogen is one of such energy carriers; however, the current methods of its production require fossil fuels and are accompanied by significant CO2 emissions. Consequently, the energy costs needed to obtain hydrogen by electrolysis exceed the amount of energy produced by burning the hydrogen. Simultaneously, the hydrogen yields for alternative ways, such as fermentation, remain low.

Objective. The aim of the work is the development of approaches to intensify the biohydrogen obtaining process from agricultural waste.

Methods. An increase in hydrogen yield was achieved using specifically grown microorganisms of the Clostridium spp. A combination of the waste fermentation process with the production of hydrogen in a microbial fuel cell (MFC), which was fed with the liquid fraction after fermentation, was employed.

Results. The yield of hydrogen depends on the component composition of the raw material. Higher lignin content in the raw material reduces the yield of hydrogen. The addition of Clostridium spp. to the natural consortium in the amount of 10% of the total inoculum led to an increase in hydrogen yield. The combination of two processes – fermentation and hydrogen production in a MFC – increased the yield of hydrogen by 1.7 times, along with a higher degree of organic raw materials utilization.

Conclusions. The additional introduction of Clostridium spp. to the hydrogen-producing consortium leads to a 7–10% increase in the yield of hydrogen, depending on the composition of the raw material. The yield of hydrogen obtained in the fermentation process for the substrate containing corn silage is 12 ± 1% higher than for the wheat straw. In general, the combination of the fermentation and hydrogen production in the MFC in a two-stage process leads to an overall increase in the yield of hydrogen by 60 ± 5%.

References

Xia A, Zhu X, Liao Q. Hydrogen production from biological sources. In: Lipman T, Weber A, editors. Fuel cells and hydrogen production: A volume in the encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. New York: Springer: 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7789-5_955

Shiva Kumar S, Lim H. An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep. 2022;8:13793-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.127

Megía PJ, Vizcaíno AJ, Calles JA, Carrero A. Hydrogen production technologies: From fossil fuels toward renewable sources. A mini review. Energy Fuels. 2021;35(20):16403-15. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02501

Golub NB, Zhurakhovska DI, Nikulina KV, Nikulina HV. Hydrogen production in anaerobic processes. Sci App J Renew Energy. 2009;2:65-73.

Saha R, Bhattacharya D, Mukhopadhyay M. Enhanced production of biohydrogen from lignocellulosic feedstocks using microorganisms: A comprehensive review. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;13:100153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100153

Boni MR, Sbaffoni S, Tuccinardi L. The influence of slaughterhouse waste on fermentative H2 production from food waste: Preliminary results. Waste Manag. 2013;33(6):1362-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.02.024

Yokoyama H, Waki M, Moriya N, Yasuda T, Tanaka Y, Haga K. Effect of fermentation temperature on hydrogen production from cow waste slurry by using anaerobic microflora within the slurry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74(2):474-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-006-0647-4

Lay JJ, Fan KS, Hwang JI, Chang JI, Hsu PC. Factors affecting hydrogen production from food wastes by Clostridium-rich composts. Environ Eng. 2005;131(4):595-602. DOI: 0.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:4(595)

Zhang J, Wang Q, Jiang J. Lime mud from paper-making process addition to food waste synergistically enhances hydrogen fermentation performance. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(6):2738-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.048

Srikanth S, Mohan S. Regulatory function of divalent cations in controlling the acidogenic biohydrogen production process. RSC Advances. 2012;2(16):6576-89. DOI: 10.1039/C2RA20383A

Demirer GN, Othman M. Two-phase thermophilic acidification and mesophilic methanogenesis anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Environ Eng Sci. 2008;25(9):1291-300. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2007.0242

Massanet-Nicolau J, Dinsdale R, Guwy A. Hydrogen production from sewage sludge using mixed microflora inoculum: Effect of pH and enzymatic pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99(14):6325-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.012

Golub NB, Shchurska KO, Trotsenko MV. Anaerobic treatment of brewery wastewater with simultaneous hydrogen production. J Water Chem Technol. 2014;2(36):90-6. DOI: 10.3103/S1063455X14020076

Drapoi D, Golub N. Hydrogen production from cellulosic materials by natural microbial association from soil enriched by Clostridium and Bacillus microorganisms. Sci Heritage. 2021;4(60):3-8. DOI: 10.24412/9215-0365-2021-60-1-3-8

Bari HE, Lahboubi N, Habchi S, Rachidi S, Bayssi O, Nabil N, et al. Biohydrogen production from fermentation of organic waste, storage and applications. Cleaner Waste Systems. 2022;3:100043. DOI: 10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100043

Honarmandrad Z, Kucharska K, Gębicki J. Processing of biomass prior to hydrogen fermentation and post-fermentative broth management. Molecules. 2022;27(21):7658. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217658

Islam R, Sparling R, Cicek N, Levin DB. Optimization of influential nutrients during direct cellulose fermentation into hydrogen by Clostridium thermocellum. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:3116-32. DOI: 10.3390/ijms16023116

Carrillo-Reyes J, Albarrán-Contreras BA, Buitrón G. Influence of added nutrients and substrate concentration in biohydrogen production from winery wastewaters coupled to methane production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2019;187(1):140-51. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-018-2812-5

Phowan P, Danvirutai P. Hydrogen production from cassava pulp hydrolysate by mixed seed cultures: effects of initial pH, substrate and biomass concentrations. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;64:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.057

Wang YY, Wang JB, Hu CX, Zhang YL. Effect of various pretreatment methods of inoculum on biohydrogen production. AMR. 2010;152-3:902-8. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.152-153.902

Hidalgo D, Pérez-Zapatero Е, Martín-Marroquín J M. Comparative effect of acid and heat inoculum pretreatment on dark fermentative biohydrogen production. Environ Res. 2023;239(2):117433. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117433

Saripan AF, Reungsang A. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose for biohydrogen production by anaerobic mixed cultures in elephant dung. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39(17):9028-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.066

Valdez-Vazquez I, Pérez-Rangel M, Tapia A, Buitrón G, Molina C, Hernández G, et al. Hydrogen and butanol production from native wheat straw by synthetic microbial consortia integrated by species of Enterococcus and Clostridium. Fuel. 2015;159:214-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.052

Cabrol L, Marone A, Venegas ET, Steyer JP, Ruiz-Filippi G, Trably, E. Microbial ecology of fermentative hydrogen producing bioprocesses: useful insights for driving the ecosystem function. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41(2):158-81. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuw043

Li G, Xu F, Yang T, Wang X, Lyu T, Huang Z. Microbial behavior and influencing factors in the anaerobic digestion of distiller: A comprehensive review. Fermentation. 2023;9(3):199. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation9030199

Wongthanate J, Chinnacotpong K, Khumpong M. Impacts of pH, temperature and pretreatment method on biohydrogen production from organic wastes by sewage microflora. Int J Energy Environ Eng. 2014;5(1):76. DOI: 10.1007/s40095-014-0076-6

Zhang ML, Fan YT, Xing Y, Pan CM, Zhang GS, Lay JJ. Enhanced biohydrogen production from cornstalk wastes with acidification pretreatment by mixed anaerobic cultures. Biomass Bioenergy. 2007;31(4):250-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.08.004

Zhang J, Jiang B, Zhang H, Qian S, Wei T, Zhang Z, et al. Fermentative hydrogen production from lignocellulose by mesophilic Clostridium populeti FZ10 Newly isolated from microcrystalline cellulose-acclimated compost. Appl Sci. 2022;12(19):9562. DOI: 10.3390/app12199562

Fadzli FS, Bhawani SA, Mohammad RE. Microbial Fuel Cell: recent developments in organic substrate use and bacterial electrode interaction. J Chem. 2021;2021:4570388. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4570388

Miftah AK, Sittijunda S, Imai T, Salakkam A, Reungsang A. Biohydrogen and methane production from sugarcane leaves pretreated by deep eutectic solvents and enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulolytic consortia. Fermentation. 2022;8(8):396. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8080396

Maman M, Sundaram M, Sarathchandra G, Kanagaraj V, Sundaram SM. Biohydrogen production - An overview on the factors affecting, microbes and enzymes involved. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci. 2022;24(3):472-9. DOI: 10.53550/ajmbes.2022.v24i03.005

Onaran G, Argun H. Direct current assisted bio-hydrogen production from acid hydrolyzed waste paper. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(34):18792-800. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.204

Downloads

Published

2024-03-03

How to Cite

1.
Golub N, Zubchenko L, Demianenko I, Zhang Y, Seminska N. Intensification of the Biohydrogen Production Process. Innov Biosyst Bioeng [Internet]. 2024Mar.3 [cited 2024Dec.10];8(1):37-45. Available from: https://ibb.kpi.ua/article/view/285588

Issue

Section

Articles