Fastest Fish Shapes and Optimal Supercavitating and Hypersonic Bodies of Revolution


  • Igor Nesteruk Institute of Hydromechanics, NAS of Ukraine; Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine



Water animal locomotion, Bodies of revolution, Load reduction, Drag reduction, Shape optimization, Unseparated shapes, Supercavitation, Hypersonic flows


Background. The best swimmers have a streamlined shape that provides a flow pattern without boundary layer separation and delays the laminar-to-turbulent transition. Their shape itself could be the reason of small drag and high locomotion velocity. The fastest fish, e.g., sailfish, swordfish, black marlin, etc. have another feature of their shape – a very sharp nose – rostrum, the purpose of which remains unclear. Popular belief that the rostrum is used by these predators to pierce their prey is often disputed.

Objective. In this study, we analyze the hydrodynamic aspects of the rostrum presence and the possible use of similar hulls for supercavitating underwater vehicles and fast penetration into water. We illustrate that shapes with the very sharp nose could be useful for hypersonic motion in order to eliminate overheating of the vehicle fuselage.

Methods. We use the known exact solutions of the Euler equations for the incompressible fluid to simulate the pressure distribution on the bodies of revolution with a sharp nose. The slender body theory is used to simulate the supercavitation and the axisymmetric air flows at high Mach numbers.

Results. Bodies of revolution with a rostrum similar to trunks of the fastest fish (sailfish, swordfish, black marlin) and corresponding pressure ant temperature coefficients were calculated. The proposed shapes ensure no stagnation points and no high pressures and temperatures on their noses at sub- and supersonic speeds both in water and air. The drag on such bodies of revolution was estimated for attached, supercavitating and supersonic flow patterns.

Conclusions. A method of calculation of axisymmetric bodies without stagnation points on their surface was proposed. This peculiarity of the shape allows diminishing the maximum pressure and temperature on the nose without a significant increase in drag. Such shapes with the sharp concave nose could be recommended for high-speed attached and supercavitating bodies of revolution and for the hypersonic motion.


Aleyev YG. Nekton. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk; 1977. p. 167-255.

Rohr J, Latz MI, Fallon S, Nauen JC, Hendricks E. Experimental approaches towards interpreting dolphin stimulated bioluminescence. J Exp Biol. 1998 May;201(9):1447-60.

Nesteruk I, Brühl M, Möller T. Testing a special shaped body of revolution similar to dolphins trunk. KPI Sci News. 2018;2:44-53. DOI: 10.20535/1810-0546.2018.2.129140

Nesteruk I. Maximal speed of underwater locomotion. Innov Biosyst Bioeng. 2019;3:152-67. DOI: 10.20535/ibb.2019.3.3.177976

Gray J. Studies in animal locomotion VI. The propulsive powers of the dolphin. J Exp Biol. 1936;13:192-99.

Fish FE, Rohr J. Review of dolphin hydrodynamics and swimming performance. San Diego: SPAWARS; 1999.

Fish FE. The myth and reality of Gray's paradox: implication of dolphin drag reduction for technology. Bioinspir Biomim. 2006;1:R17-R25. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/1/2/r01

Fish FE, Legac P, Williams TM, Wei T. Measurement of hydrodynamic force generation by swimming dolphins using bubble DPIV. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:252-60. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.087924

Bale R, Hao M, Bhalla APS, Patel N, Patankar NA. Gray's paradox: A fluid mechanical perspective. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5904. DOI: 10.1038/srep05904

Top 10: What are the fastest fish in the world? [Internet]. BBC Science Focus Magazine. 2020 [cited 2020 Sept 15]. Available from:

KNOWLEDGE G, Anwar S. Top 10 Fastest Fish in the World [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sept 15]. Available from:

Swordfish [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sept 15]. Available from:

Loitsyanskiy LG. Mechanics of liquids and gases. 6th ed. New York, Wallingford: Begell House; 1995. p. 323-34.

Nesteruk I. Technology applications of the low drag shapes of aquatic animals. Biosci Bioeng. 2015;1(2):29-33.

Cole JD. Perturbation methods in applied mathematics. Waltham, London: Blaisdell Pub. Co.; 1968.p. 180-96.

Nesteruk I. Body forms of minimal drag. Dopovidi AN Ukr SSR Ser A. 1989;4:57-60.

Lutz T, Wagner S. Drag reduction and shape optimization of airship bodies. J Aircraft. 1998;35(3):345-51. DOI: 10.2514/2.2313

Goldschmied FR. Integrated hull design, boundary layer control and propulsion of submerged bodies: wind tunnel verification. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/SAE/ASME 18th Joint Propulsion Conference; 1982; Cleveland. Paper 82-1204. DOI: 10.2514/6.1982-1204

Hansen RJ, Hoyt JG. Laminar-to-turbulent transition on a body of revolution with an extended favorable pressure gradient forebody. J Fluids Eng. 1984;106:202-10. DOI: 10.1115/1.3243103

Knapp RT, Daily JW, Hammitt FG. Cavitation. New York: McGraw Hill; 1970.

Logvinovich GV. Hydrodynamics of flows with free boundaries. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka; 1969.

Franc JP, Michel JM. Fundamentals of cavitation. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2004.

Nesteruk I. Supercavitation. Advances and perspectives. Springer; 2012.

Nesteruk I, Savchenko YM, Shepetyuk BD. Estimations of the cavitator curvature influence on pressure drag for a supercavitational axisymmetric circumfluence. Rep NAS Ukr. 2003;8:59-64.

Nesteruk I. Calculation of steady axisymmetric supercavity flows of compressible fluid. Bull Kyiv Univer Ser Phys Math. 2003;4:109-18.

Anderson JD. Hypersonic and high temperature gas dynamics. 2nd ed. Reston: AIAA Inc.; 2006.

Han Q, Sun C, Tao Y, Li Z, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Thermal protection of a hypersonic vehicle by modulating stagnation-point heat flux. Aerospace Sci Technol. 2020;98:105673. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105673

Marley ChD. Thermal management in a scramjet-powered hypersonic cruise vehicle [dissertation on the internet]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2018. [cited 2020 Sept 15]. Available from:

Falkiewicz NJ, Cesnik CES, Crowell AR, McNamara JJ. Reduced-order aerothermoelastic framework for hypersonic vehicle control simulation. AIAA J. 2011;49(8):1625-46. DOI: 10.2514/1.j050802

Klock RJ, Cesnik CES. Nonlinear thermal reduced-order modelingfor hypersonic vehicles. AIAA J. 2017;55(7):2358-68. DOI: 10.2514/1.j055499

Brown RL, Das K, Cizmas PGA, Whitcomb JD. Numerical investigation of actively cooled structures in hypersonic flow. J Aircraft. 2014;51(5):1522-31. DOI: 10.2514/1.c032394

Corda S, Anderson JD. Viscous optimized hypersonic waveriders designed from axisymmetric flow fields. In: Proceedings of 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting; 1988; Reno. Paper 88-0369. DOI: 10.2514/6.1988-369

Bowcutt KG, Anderson JD, Capriotti D. Viscous optimized hypersonic waveriders. In: Proceedings of 25th Aerospace Sciences Meeting; 1987; Reno. Paper 87-0272. DOI: 10.2514/6.1987-272

Ding F, Shen CB, Liu J, Huang W. Influence of surface pressure distribution of basic flow field on shape and performance of waverider. Acta Astronaut. 2015;108:62-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.038

He XZ, Le JL, Wu YC. Design of a curved cone derived waverider forebody. In: Proceedings of 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference; 2009; Bremen. Paper 2009-7423. DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-7423

Jones JG, Moore KC, Pike J, Roe PL. A method for designing lifting configurations for high supersonic speeds, using axisymmetric flow fields. Ing Arch. 1968;37:56-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF00532683

Lewis MJ. Application of waverider-based configurations to hypersonic vehicle design. In: Proceedings of 9th Applied Aerodynamics Conference; 1991; Baltimore. Paper 91-3304. DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-3304

Rodriguez DL. Multidisciplinary optimization of a supersonic inlet using a Cartesian CFD method. In: Proceedings of 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference; 2004; Albany. AIAA Paper 2004-4492. DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-4492

Takashima N, Lewis MJ. Navier–Stokes computation of a viscous optimized waverider. J Spacecr Rockets. 1994;31(3):383-91. DOI: 10.2514/3.26450

Nielsen JN. Missile aerodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.; 1960.

Chen J, Fan X, Xiong B, Meng Z, Wang Y. Parameterization and optimization for the axisymmetric forebody of hypersonic vehicle. Acta Astronautica. 2020;167:239-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.10.047




How to Cite

Nesteruk I. Fastest Fish Shapes and Optimal Supercavitating and Hypersonic Bodies of Revolution. Innov Biosyst Bioeng [Internet]. 2020Nov.4 [cited 2024Jun.13];4(4):169-78. Available from: